Dominic Scott

Levels of Argument
Dominic Scott · 2015
על הספר
Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suffice, Aristotle because he thinks there is no need to go beyond it.
פרטי הספר
- שנה
- 2015
- שפה
- English
- הוצאה
- Oxford University Press
- מהדורות
- 3
- עמודים
- 240
- ISBN
- 9780199249640
מקור הנתונים: Wikidata
עוד של Dominic Scott
Dominic Scott

Listening to Reason in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2020
Dominic Scott

Maieusis
Dominic Scott · 2008
Dominic Scott

Plato's Timaeus
Dominic Scott · 2008
Dominic Scott

Recollection and Experience
Dominic Scott · 1995
Dominic Scott
Contemplation and Society in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2025
Dominic Scott
Contemplation and Civic Happiness in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2024
Dominic Scott
Models of Leadership in Plato and Beyond
Dominic Scott · 2021
Dominic Scott
Mergers Acquisitions for You !
Dominic Scott · 2016
Dominic Scott
Plato's Meno
Dominic Scott · 2009
Dominic Scott
Plato's 'Meno'. Cambridge Studies in the Dialogues of Plato
Dominic Scott · 2006