Settled Versus Right

"[This book] develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. [The author] contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go."--

שנה

2017

שפה

English

הוצאה

Cambridge University Press

מהדורות

6

עמודים

188

ISBN

9781107127531

מקור הנתונים: Wikidata