Dominic Scott

Levels of Argument
Dominic Scott · 2015
Where to buy
Amazon’s price changes daily, so the most accurate place to see it is there, at the moment you buy.
View on AmazonAbout the book
Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suffice, Aristotle because he thinks there is no need to go beyond it.
Book details
- Year
- 2015
- Language
- English
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Editions
- 3
- Pages
- 240
- ISBN
- 9780199249640
Data source: Wikidata
More by Dominic Scott
Dominic Scott

Listening to Reason in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2020
Dominic Scott

Maieusis
Dominic Scott · 2008
Dominic Scott

Plato's Timaeus
Dominic Scott · 2008
Dominic Scott

Recollection and Experience
Dominic Scott · 1995
Dominic Scott
Contemplation and Society in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2025
Dominic Scott
Contemplation and Civic Happiness in Plato and Aristotle
Dominic Scott · 2024
Dominic Scott
Models of Leadership in Plato and Beyond
Dominic Scott · 2021
Dominic Scott
Mergers Acquisitions for You !
Dominic Scott · 2016
Dominic Scott
Plato's Meno
Dominic Scott · 2009
Dominic Scott
Plato's 'Meno'. Cambridge Studies in the Dialogues of Plato
Dominic Scott · 2006