Objectivity Is Not Neutrality

In Objectivity Is Not Neutrality, Haskell argues for a moderate historicism that acknowledges the force of perspective and reaffirms the pluralistic practices of a liberal democratic society - even while upholding time-honored distinctions between fact and fiction, scholarship and propaganda, right and might. Rather than simply telling stories of events or delivering the historian's familiar "report from the archives," Haskell address questions that will interest philosophers and literary theorists no less than historians. In this book terms such as moral obligation, convention, interest, and formalism take on a new and sometimes troubling significance. Haskell explores topics ranging from the productivity of slave labor to the cultural concomitants of capitalism, from John Stuart Mill's youthful "mental crisis" to the cognitive preconditions that set the stage for antislavery and other humanitarian reforms after 1750. He traces the surprisingly short history of the word responsibility, which turns out to be no older than the United States. And he asks whether the epistemological radicalism of recent years carries the power to justify human rights - rights of academic freedom, for example, or the right not to be tortured. Written by a thoughtful critic of the historical profession, Objectivity Is Not Neutrality calls upon historians to think deeply about the nature of historical explanation and to acknowledge more fully than ever before the theoretical dimension of their work.

First sentence: Time on the Cross, a book about the history of slavery in the United States by economists Robert Fogel and Stanley Engerman, took the country by storm in the spring of 1974.

Year

1997

Language

English

Publisher

The Johns Hopkins University Press

Editions

2

Pages

440

ISBN

9780801856815

Data source: Wikidata